Pembroke Dock planning application submission deadline 22 January 2021
Planning Application: 20/0732/PA – Demolition, part demolition and infill, modification of slipways, erection of buildings and ancillary development – for port related activities including the manufacture of marine energy devices, boat manufacture and repair and erection of plant (outline planning permission with all matters reserved for future consideration) – Pembroke Dockyard, The Dockyard, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6TE.
The NDS has objected to this planning application, submitted by Milford Haven Port Authority (MHPA), which would infill listed structures and construct 40m high buildings in the historic Pembroke Royal Dockyard. We consider that these proposals would cause substantial harm to the significance of the Pembroke Dock Conservation Area and the loss of many Grade II and II* listed heritage assets. We contend that the arguments presented for this scheme do not justify such harm and that insufficient evidence has been presented for consideration of alternative brownfield sites. The fact that this is an outline planning application also carries further, as yet unspecified, risks to the historic assets. For these reasons we call on the Local Planning Authority to refuse planning permission.
The proposed scheme would severely damage Pembroke Dock Conservation Area and crucial listed buildings. The Grade II* Graving Dock would be infilled and partially built over, the Grade II Timber Pond infilled and built over, and the Grade II Building Slips Nos 1 and 2 partially demolished and removed. It would also be detrimental to the setting of the adjacent Grade II Carr Jetty, which adds to the group value of these threatened structures at Pembroke Dockyard.
These structures are the last and most important features of the magnificent and unique assemblage of thirteen slips, graving dock and timber pond constructed and functioning 1809–1926. Pembroke Dock specialised in building warships during the transition from wood to iron and steel, sail to steam and turbines. While the eastern slips were sacrificed in 1979 for the Irish ferry terminal and the deep-water berth Quay 1, we now live in a more responsible era, when significant community assets merit planning protection.
The Royal Dockyard established at Pembroke Dock from 1809 was entirely unique: the only one in Wales, the only one on the west coast of Britain, and the only one created solely as a shipbuilding facility. It built over 260 warships for the Royal Navy, including many of the most prestigious warships of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, as well as five royal yachts. Many of these vessels were built on the two large slipways at the western end of the yard which are threatened by the current development proposal.
After the closure of the dockyard in 1926 the facilities were turned over to the Royal Air Force, and for some time the former dockyard site was the largest flying boat base in the world, its aircraft playing a significant role in the Battle of the Atlantic. The Royal Marine, and later Army, forts and garrisons established to defend Pembroke Dockyard – many of which were maintained well into current memory – have combined with the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force to give the area a rich military character and flavour. The Dockyard represents the core of this heritage.
The Royal Dockyard was the reason for the establishment of the town of Pembroke Dock; without the former, the latter would not exist. The dockyard brought an entirely new workforce to the area, many of whom were originally from the west of England and brought their families with them, giving the town and wider area its unique demographic and West Country or Cornish surnames.
NDS Criteria for Objecting
- Destruction (demolition/infilling) of the listed structures – The Grade II* Graving Dock would be infilled and partially built over, the Grade II Timber Pond infilled and built over, and the Grade II Building Slips Nos 1 and 2 partially demolished and removed.
- Depletion of the national stock of historic dockyard features – intact timber ponds are nationally very rare. The example at Pembroke Dock survives intact and is especially fine, with an additional function as a tidal reservoir to speed up the filling of the dry dock. It is therefore a matter of concern that this will be effectively destroyed, as there is no evidence that such a process has ever been successfully reversed. Instead, this historic group of listed structures could become the authentic core of sustainable placemaking.
- Damage to the legibility of the dockyard – The dockyard, which occupies historic vistas around the Haven, will no longer be seen. The group of three surviving slipways seen on Google Earth, together with the associated dry dock and timber pond, are a remarkable group which represent the heart of the historic dockyard and, if made publicly accessible, would immensely lift the dockyard’s importance in the eyes of the public, with great tourist potential, and also provide context for the many listed dockyard buildings that survive further east.
- Disregard for Planning Policy Wales (Edition 10, 2018) and the principles of the Pembroke Dock Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Plan (2017) – These state that there should be a general presumption in favour of the preservation or enhancement of a listed building and a conservation area and their settings. For any development proposal, the most important consideration is the statutory requirement to preserve buildings, their settings and any features of special architectural or historic interest.
- Level of harm to the historic environment versus public benefit is not demonstrated – There is insufficient evidence that MHPA has evaluated other possible sites around the Haven. The NDS accepts that improving Pembroke Dock employment is desirable, but how many of the new jobs proposed by this scheme will be for locals, and how many for companies from further afield and even overseas? Where is the evidence for local jobs? Moreover, by rejecting the viability of heritage to drive economic and social benefit to the community MHPA ignores economic evidence from other dockyard towns such as Portsmouth (£610.3 million p.a. to the local economy) and Chatham (£4.54 million p.a. in the Medway and Kent economies) from tourism and business.
Despite its Welsh significance, the heritage of Pembroke Dockyard and its surroundings has arguably never been treated with the respect it deserves and has never been comprehensively interpreted in ways accessible to the public.
The NDS views this application as utterly negating existing policies to conserve the listed dock, timber pond and slips which signify the origins of its community. The Society urges that an alternative site in the area be found for the proposed marine engineering facilities and a fresh lens be directed at interpreting and conserving Pembroke Dockyard’s remaining heritage.
As highlighted within the above criteria, this application fails to comply with local and national planning policies for the protection of Pembrokeshire’s historic environment, and the NDS calls upon the LPA to refuse planning permission.
Dr Ann Coats
21 January 2021
Call for Papers
25th Annual Conference: 27 March 2021
Dockyards and Baltic Campaigns (1721–2021): Comparisons and Transformations
This one-day conference will examine the role of the naval dockyards and bases that were closely associated with Baltic naval campaigns. 1721 was the year that the Great Northern War was finally concluded. The key dockyards in this war were Copenhagen, Karlskrona, Chatham, St Petersburg and Kronstadt. Britain’s concern was to maintain the balance of power, sending large squadrons into the Baltic to ensure the continued supply of naval stores: especially Russian hemp, Swedish iron and ‘East Country’ timber.
Please see the Call for Papers, deadline 31 January 2021
10 December 2020
Threat to Portsmouth Harbour
Chris Donnithorne, a former naval officer, has released a report which raises urgent concerns about the immediate and future viability of Portsmouth Harbour. The NDS is launching this report to raise awareness of multiple threats arising from recent environmental interventions.
Portsmouth Harbour is an amalgam of natural and manmade events, originating when rising sea levels drowned the coastal plain after the last Ice Age. Its entrance has been kept clear by a scouring ‘double high tide’ and the influx of river water from the South Downs, but it has required occasional dredging at the harbour mouth to reduce the silt bar. With its creeks, streams and mudbanks, the harbour is a complex organism which is showing identifiable signs of stress.
See the Report here and our Campaigns, Threat to Portsmouth Harbour webpage https://navaldockyards.org/threat-to-portsmouth-harbour/ for more information about the Report.
Dr. Ann Coats
30 November 2020 (updated 20 December 2020)
Naval Dockyards Society Virtual Conference: 31 Oct 2020 10.30–4.00
Where Empires Collide:
Dockyards and Naval Bases around the Indian Ocean
This one-day virtual conference will examine the role and scope of naval bases and naval support facilities in and around the Indian Ocean.
Were bases built to defend colonies, control colonies, or to attack the enemy? Were they to suppress local forces, engage companies threatening the British East India Company or as adjuncts to European struggles? How useful were they to their founding countries in the 17th–20th centuries? How has their heritage developed?
Programme: Chair Ann Coats
10.30–11.05 Thean Potgieter Commanding ‘the passage to and from India’: The Royal Navy at the Cape of Good Hope, 1795–1803
11.05–11.40 David Erickson The Contribution of Simon’s Town to Diplomatic & Naval Affairs, 1795–1957
- View of Simon’s Town looking southwards to the entrance to False Bay, with Cape Hangklip on the horizon to the left and Simon’s Bay in the foreground.
- The Martello Tower of 1795, situated inside the Simon’s Town East Dockyard. This was the first construction made by the British after the 1795 invasion.
Credits David Erickson
11.40-11.50 10-minute break
11.50–12.25 Robert Ivermee The Hooghly River and the limits of colonial power: European dockyards and naval bases in Bengal
12.25–1.00 Patricia O’Sullivan Out of the Shadows – the Police Force of Hong Kong’s Royal Naval Dockyard
1.30-2.05 Erik Odegard Dutch, French and British planners and Trincomalee naval dockyard
2.05-2.40 Richard Holme Trincomalee in the twentieth century: The use of floating docks in the Indian Ocean
2.40–2.50 10-minute break
2.50-3.25 Philip MacDougall In Support of Napoleon’s Great Adventure – the navy of Tipu Sultan. Its design, construction and purpose
3.25-4.00 Karim Malak The Anglo-Egyptian Naval Encounter: A new history of Egypt and Britain
4.00 Chair’s thanks
Booking is through Eventbrite. Joining details will be sent out one day before, and shortly before, the conference begins. https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/where-empires-collide-dockyards-and-naval-bases-around-the-indian-ocean-tickets-125591843585
25 October 2020
Announcing the Award of five £1000 Grants by NDS to Small Dockyard Museum or Dockyard Heritage Site Projects
The 2020 Naval Dockyards Society AGM agreed that part of its small surplus of funds could be used to award five grants of £1,000 each to small dockyard museum or dockyard heritage site projects. It was felt that grants could make a real difference to the future enhancement of worthy museums or sites.
Successful applications were received from the following sites:
Bluetown Remembered (Sheerness)
The project will further raise the profile of Sheerness Dockyard and Blue Town heritage, run from Bluetown Remembered, a music hall built in 1841, later a cinema. One floor is dedicated to Sheerness Dockyard. It welcomes over 20,000 visitors each year. The NDS grant will fund a booklet on Sheerness Dockyard for all Sheppey schools, part of two Kent-wide schemes, Wheels of Time and the Children’s University, bringing in families from all over Kent. It will also finance six monthly lectures about the dockyard and Blue Town to encourage history groups to visit as well as locals. Preshow tours of the island and the dockyard will be used to help promote the dockyard to this wider audience. Special events for care homes will also be hosted.
The Dockyard Museum at Antigua Naval Dockyard
A multidisciplinary research, interpretation, and public outreach programme has been developed entitled ‘8 March Project’ under the theme ‘Dockyard History is African History’, to recover and interpret archival and archaeological evidence of the enslaved and free Africans and their descendants who made possible the naval dockyard at Antigua, established in 1725. The ‘8 March Project’ identified eight enslaved Africans who lost their lives in an explosion on 8 March 1744. These names launched a project to recover more names of enslaved Africans who worked in the yard, which has recovered more than 650 names. In 2021 the dockyard museum will initiate an expanded programme including creative works by students from Antigua State College and the local Cobbs Cross Primary School, telling the stories of enslaved workers. The students will bring parents and grandparents.
Museum of Slavery and Freedom, Deptford
This embryonic organisation aspires to acquire permanent premises, working alongside Action for Community Development in Deptford. The project, ‘Chip on Your Shoulder’, will combine Deptford Dockyard history and the Museum of Slavery and Freedom (MōSaF). It will use the Deptford Pepys Resource Centre as an anchor hub for museum tours about Deptford Dockyard, its support of maritime communities, and its links to the African, Irish and Asian diaspora. Deptford is significant as it was home to John Hawkins who became a prominent early English slave trader. MōSaF will demonstrate how Deptford, London and the United Kingdom grew rich from the slave trade but also explore the extent to which freedom from slavery was won and celebrate the many cultures and peoples who live consequently in the UK. The Lenox Project has kindly offered £500 to help fund this project.
Sheerness Dockyard Preservation Trust (SDPT)
SDPT was founded in 2014 to conserve the historic buildings of the former Royal Dockyard at Sheerness. The Trust’s focus has been to rescue and reuse the Grade II* listed former Dockyard Church, built in 1828 to the designs of George Ledwell Taylor, Navy Board surveyor. In 2001 it was gutted by fire. The Trust has developed a project to conserve the building and convert it into a mixed-use community facility with an events space, a business start-up centre for young people, and a permanent display gallery housing part of the 1820s dockyard model. This model will play a significant part in informing the public of the history of the dockyard and the church’s place in that community. The NDS grant will contribute towards the interpretation and conservation of the model.
The Unicorn Preservation Society, Dundee
Robert Seppings, the Industrial Revolution & HMS Unicorn’. 2022 is the 200th anniversary of the keel laying of Robert Seppings’s frigate HMS Unicorn on No 4 slip at Chatham. From 1800, many factors affected ship construction methods and yard operations, such as the increased availability of consistent wrought iron and steam propulsion. Seppings developed wrought iron diagonal straps to increase the torsional stiffness of the hull and wrought iron knees, offering greater strength at less weight. HMS Unicorn is now the only remaining ship which fully illustrates Seppings’s approach. The grant will be used, with other funding, for an exhibition linking the Industrial Revolution, Seppings’s ship design and shipbuilding in Dundee and naval dockyards. It will utilise oral histories of those who worked in the Dundee shipyards and link outreach to relevant school curricula.
This was an exceptional event for the Society and it was very exciting to see the range of projects thus funded, reflecting the scope of dockyard cultural significance. The NDS is optimistic that these inputs will enable wider interpretation of dockyard heritage, ‘as an oak cometh of a litel spyr’ (Geoffrey Chaucer, Troilus and Criseyde, Book 2).
All of the photos are courtesy of the respective organisations, we have permission to use them, no names of photographers have been supplied.
23 September 2020
Graving Dock Victory at Turnchapel, near Plymouth!
We can report a victory to save an 1804 dry/graving dock near Plymouth from destruction.
As you may recall, Richard Holme was contacted by Turnchapel History Group in January 2020 about their research into the dock and Turnchapel’s shipbuilders going back to the seventeenth century.
In June 2020 we were asked for support concerning a planning application (19/01810/FUL) to build a large industrial unit over the old Graving Dock at Turnchapel Wharf. The development would have cut right through the granite lined dock, which has been filled in for many years. (See Letter to Plymouth CC 18 June 2020)
The result of the planning meeting on 18 June 2020 was a deferral to investigate an engineering solution to avoid the roof impacting on the conservation area. ‘Unfortunately, one suggestion was to dig down to keep the building roof height. That would have destroyed any archaeological remains of the graving dock. ‘So, we’ve won the first battle but not the war.’ (Turnchapel History Group)
‘Both our councillor and Conservation Area residents’ representative quoted your letter in their presentations, so your input was extremely helpful. We might need more help as they start to explore their options so will be in touch.’ (Turnchapel History Group)
At the deferred committee meeting 20 August 2020, to which we sent the second letter (see Letter to Plymouth CC 17 August 2020), the proposal was unanimously rejected by the councillors. Turnchapel History Group reports: ‘We expect YH [Yacht Haven Group] to appeal the decision, but we will cross that bridge when the time comes. In the meantime, many thanks again for your help and support.’
24 August 2020
Portsmouth Historic Dockyard re-opening
I am delighted to be able to pass on this news about Portsmouth Historic Dockyard re-opening, with even better news: a new combined ticket for all attractions.
6 August 2020
2020 Offer: NDS Transactions 2 for 1 or 3 for 2 offer
As the NDS store is full to bursting, we are making this 2020 offer (valid until 31 December 2020) for those who might wish to buy specific volumes; something for you to read in what remains of the lockdown, or a gift for someone who might be interested.
Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, vol. 1, Portsmouth Dockyard in the Age of Nelson (2006) £10.0
Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, vol. 2, Gibraltar as a Naval Base and Dockyard (2006) £10.00
Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, vol. 3, Structures, Communities & Re-use (2007) £10.00
Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, vol. 4, Management & Construction (2008) £10.00
Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, vol. 5, Venice & Malta (2009) £15.00
Transactions Naval Dockyards Society, vol. 6, Surgeons and the Royal Navy (2010) £15.00
Transactions Naval Dockyards Society, vol. 7, Building Victory: Mid-Eighteenth Century Naval Warfare – Roles of Dockyards and Shipbuilding (2011) £15.00
Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, vol. 8, Pepys and Chips: Dockyards, Naval Administration & Warfare in the 17th Century (2012) £15.00
Please note the original price when you total your order. Add up the full original prices and deduct the cheapest price. If you wish to purchase multiples of 2, calculate accordingly.
UK Postage: £3.00 for 2; £4.50 for 3 volumes. Overseas postage will need to be checked.
To check what is in each volume, see https://navaldockyards.org/transactions/
Order from Dr Ann Coats firstname.lastname@example.org
Please pay by BACS or PayPal to Naval Dockyards Society
After you made the payment please email email@example.com that you have done so.
Account Name The Naval Dockyards Society
Sort Code 60-09-16
Account No. 51358719
Go to the PayPal website and ask to send money. Enter email address firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr Ann Coats FRHistS
Chair Naval Dockyards Society
26 June 2020
Naval Dockyards Society announces 5 Dockyard Project Grants
Who knows where an initial discovery can lead? Historic England investigated the dismantling site of Charles Darwin’s exploration ship Beagle, which sailed to South America and twice circumnavigated the world (Hunt for Darwin’s HMS Beagle Reveals Dock Outline)
This has led to the listing of a mud dock berth at Paglesham, Essex as a Scheduled Monument (https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1467785). The list entry also recognises Beagle’s later career as a Coastguard Watch Vessel and the rarity of surviving mud docks. Such legacies have many meanings to local maritime communities and can become critical in enhancing local engagement in dockyard heritage.
Such small beginnings can stimulate local volunteers to carry out research into the dockyard site, write histories about its ships and people and hold open days. Thus the community learns about its evolving landscape, crafts and society, which ties it to larger stories. This can lead to more permanent sites, volunteer opportunities, and engagement with schools and visitors.
Through the hard work of committee members and the generosity of members, the Naval Dockyards Society has accumulated a small surplus of funds beyond those needed for forthcoming publications. The 2020 AGM agreed that this could be used to support a dockyard museum/dockyard heritage site project. The Society will award five grants of £1,000 each, to help fulfil the NDS Constitution Aim and specific Objectives:
To stimulate the production and exchange of information and research into naval dockyards and associated organisations. The Naval Dockyards Society is an international organisation which is concerned with and publishes material on naval dockyards and associated activities, including victualling, medicine, ordnance, shipbuilding, shipbreaking, coastguard stations, naval air stations, provisions and supplies; all aspects of their construction, history, archaeology, conservation, workforce, surrounding communities and family history; and all aspects of their buildings, structures and monuments relating to naval history. The Society is therefore involved closely in the terrestrial, aviation and underwater heritage of all these sites.
Specific Constitution Objectives to:
5 Increase public awareness of historic dockyards and related sites.
6 Create links with related organisations in Britain and abroad.
7 Coordinate and promote new research into the topics relevant to the Aim.
8 Coordinate the historical, architectural and technical expertise available within the society to enhance dockyard sites and campaign against threats of damage or the destruction of dockyards or related sites.
10 Endeavour to increase access to historic dockyards and related sites.
12 Offer assistance to those establishing dockyard heritage sites.
13 Encourage the storage and collection of relevant archives and oral history interviews related to dockyard history.
The NDS wishes to support a small dockyard museum or heritage site organisation anywhere in the world, such as a not-for-profit organisation with 0-5 employed staff or an elected committee, with a constitution and annual member meetings. This sum could make a real difference to the future enhancement of a worthy museum or site.
What is a dockyard and a dockyard museum or dockyard heritage site?
A dockyard builds, fits out, supplies and repairs naval ships. Dockyards are defined by dry docks, from which water can be drained or pumped out for repairing or dismantling, whereas shipbuilding can be carried out on a slip, but the term was sometimes used where the yard did not have a dock. A dockyard was literally the yard that grew around the dock. The term implies naval ownership, but in this instance also encompasses commercial yards which built for the navy.
A dockyard museum or dockyard heritage site comprises groups of buildings or structures which, because of their distinctive architecture, fabric or their place in the landscape, display historical, aesthetic, communal and social value. This could be tangibly or intangibly associated with events or living traditions, ideas, beliefs, artistic and literary works of significance.
10 June 2020 (modified16/06/2020)
Bermuda – Further historic research to record the times of closure of the Dockyard
Last year I formed a Facebook group to collect and record the stories of the Dockyard workers and their families during and immediately after the Second World War (Bermuda Dockyard. Family life on the island 1936 to 1952)
In early 1950 the United Kingdom announced that Bermuda Dockyard would close within one year. This decision had a dramatic effect on the lives of both the families and personnel who were to be repatriated to the UK and on the well being of the people of Bermuda.
I am in the process of creating a record of this historic event and invite anyone with a story or with information from this period and specifically of the Dockyard closure to add to the record at https://www.facebook.com/groups/408892213001927/.
The dockyard, its township, residences, and facilities were abandoned within 9 months of that announcement. Repatriation to the United Kingdom involved 178 Service Personnel; 1124 civilians; 570 family members.
Some 500 Bermudians were no longer employed in H.M. Dockyard and the many businesses that supplied the Dockyard were left without an income or a market.
The Population of Bermuda in 1950 was about 37, 000 and the closure of the dockyard had a massive impact on the economy on many families and individuals.
Roger Bendall – Member of the Naval Dockyards Society
20 February 2020
Another chapter in the sad story of Bermuda Dockyard workers’ housing
The last remaining terrace of workers’ houses, Albert Row, listed by the Bermuda Government, is threatened with demolition by the government quango West End Development Corporation (WEDCo), which is responsible for its care. Other workers’ houses at Portland Place, Princess Louise Terrace, Clarence Terrace, Victoria Row and Marine Terrace at Lodge Point have all been demolished.
Despite an NDS campaign dating from 2012, urging WEDCo to maintain is properties adequately, WEDCo then stated that it had carried out no maintenance apart from Health and Safety since 2009. As a result, Victoria Row was demolished in 2016, even though it took several weeks and cost $331,400. The houses were evidently not so derelict as portrayed.
The NDS was alerted to the new threat to Albert Row and wrote to WEDCo, the Royal Gazette and government bodies.
NDS members Brian Hyde and Roger Bendall, associated with the dockyard all their lives, responded generously with photographs and letters to the National Museum of Bermuda, Bermuda National Trust and Royal Gazette, which are supportive of the dockyars’s heritage.
Roger Bendall’s letter was published by the Royal Gazette: J. Bell, ‘Call to save historic Albert Row’, Royal Gazette, Oct 17, 2019, http://www.royalgazette.com/news/article/20191017/call-to-save-historic-albert-row.
See the NDS’s Bermuda Campaign page for the background to Victoria and Albert Rows.
For more information about Bermuda Dockyard, look at Roger Bendall’s Facebook group ‘Bermuda Dockyard community during the Second World war and the postwar years’
19 October 2019
Britain’s second carrier leaves for sea trials
HMS Prince of Wales leaves Rosyth Dockyard (where she was built) for the first time, for sea trials, 19 September 2019. (Crown Copyright, 2019).
28 September 2019
‘Hidden Deptford: An evening of our maritime history’, St Nicholas, Deptford, 7 February 2019
Attending a Lenox Project event to publicise building a replica of the 1678 3rd rate ship on a chilly February evening, I was astounded to enter a packed St Nicholas’s Church. The audience figure was 268, an amazing number, showing how topical Deptford Dockyard and its shipbuilding community is to its residents. It had been advertised on https://londonist.com/london/things-to-do/things-to-do-today-in-london-thursday-7-february-2019 but most of the audience must already have planned to attend.
Normally the handsome church of Saint Nicholas is much emptier, allowing one to examine closely the beautiful carvings and eminent shipwrights’ and naval memorials and those of the children of fellow-diarist and friend of Samuel Pepys, John Evelyn, who lived in nearby Sayes Court. But on this occasion Deptford residents were enjoying the relaxed, informative and amusing talks of two leading seventeenth century historians, Dr David Davies and Richard Endsor.
David, best-selling author of Pepys’s Navy: Ships, Men and Warfare 1649-89 and Kings of the Sea: Charles II, James II and the Royal Navy, began with the reasons for the dockyard’s creation by Henry VIII. The most important were its convenience by river from the seats of government at Whitehall, the City and the Tower, its protection upriver from foreign attack and its nearness to Greenwich royal palace. As many wars until the late seventeenth century were fought in or across the North Sea, the Thames was the centre of warship building. Deptford and Woolwich therefore became key research and development yards which could be managed fairly closely by the Navy Office situated in the City. David and Richard gave many examples of Charles II and Samuel Pepys, secretary to the Navy Board and later to the Admiralty, visiting frequently for business, ship launches and pleasure. Ultimately Deptford’s distance from the sea marked the end of its usefulness, however. By the nineteenth century it was becoming less accessible for larger naval ships and was eventually closed as a dockyard in 1869.
Richard spoke of the women of Restoration Deptford, emphasising the forcefulness of iron contractor Susan Beckford and Ann Pearson’s post as ratcatcher. He tracked Pepys’s seduction of shipwright’s wife Mrs Bagwell, apparently with the approval of her family, through his Diary and the invaluable ADM 106 correspondence at The National Archives. He also described how Charles II gave his mistresses enormous power and status. Louise de Kéroualle, created Duchess of Portsmouth, was the mistress most connected to Lenox, the first of the 1670s and 1680s Thirty Ships building programme, as she attended the launch in 1678 with her son Charles Lenox, aged 6. Apparently, Charles II treated the people of Deptford to a slap-up meal to celebrate afterwards. Richard also spoke of eminent Deptford shipwrights such as John Shish who built the Lenox, the speaker’s skilful watercolours adding greatly to our understanding of the events he described so fully. The talk was enriched by social and technical detail from ADM 106 which would otherwise be unknown.
The break between the speakers was enjoyably enlivened by the South East London Folk Orchestra, the church resonating with the audience joining in the folk songs and shanties. Lenox Project Director Julian Kingston (email@example.com) described the origins of the Lenox Project, acknowledging the artistic generosity of Richard, whose book, The Restoration Warship: The Design, Construction and Career of a Third Rate of Charles II’s Navy, sparked the idea to rebuild the Lenox. Julian related how the Project is working with Deptford Dockyard developers Hutchison Whampoa and Lewisham Borough Council to bring the plan to fruition, including some innovative ideas for acquiring timber. In the process it is raising awareness of Deptford’s international, national and local heritage and will train Lewisham young people in transferable craftsmanship and IT skills.
While the event was free to get in, organiser Esther Lie joked that it would cost £20 to leave! The collection box on the door was certainly accumulating significant amounts of the folding stuff for the Lenox Project. This is altogether a heartening story of how committed, well organised and knowledgeable enthusiasts can galvanise a community and the authorities by what at first might have seemed a fantasy but appears to be well on its way to realisation.
Dr Ann Coats
Picture credits: Diana Endsor
Richard’s oil painting of the Lenox launch in 1678 can be seen in the NDS website banner at https://navaldockyards.org/
For more information about the event and the Lenox Project, see http://www.buildthelenox.org/home/
For extensive studies of Deptford Dockyard’s archaeology and history see Antony Francis, The Deptford royal dockyard and manor of Sayes Court, London: excavations 2000–12, MOLA Monograph Series 71 (London, 2017) and Philip MacDougall, ed., Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, Volume 11, Five Hundred Years of Deptford and Woolwich Royal Dockyards (Naval Dockyards Society, Portsmouth, 2019), ISBN 978-0-9929292-8-2.
2 March 2019
Navy Board Project at The National Archives (TNA) is extended for another year
At its 1999 AGM the Naval Dockyards Society agreed to support Sue Lumas’s proposal for a project listing ADM 106 at the Public Record Office. This ‘valuable collection’ (D. Baugh, Naval Administration in the age of Walpole (1965), 537) of Navy Board in-letters 1658–1837 comprises miscellaneous correspondence from dockyard commissioners, dockyard officers, naval captains, dockyard contractors and dockyard workers from around the world.
Of the 1,019 boxes of correspondence in ADM 106/281-1299, 881 boxes have been catalogued to date and are searchable on Discovery, TNA online catalogue. Fewer than 100 boxes remain to be processed. Note: each box can contain up to 500 individual letters.
The Navy Board Project (NBP) was one of the first TNA volunteer projects to be linked to another archival collection. Listing of ADM 106 at Kew was soon joined by the volunteer listing of Navy Board out-letters to the Admiralty, 1738–1809, at the Caird Library, National Maritime Museum Greenwich. ADM/B and ADM/BP at the National Maritime Museum are searchable on TNA Discovery as ADM 106/354 and ADM 106/359 respectively.
The NBP was due to end on 31 March 2018, but at the wish of the AGM, the NDS wrote to the TNA Catalogue Panel and User Participation Boards to request them to reconsider the deadline, as completion was so close. This week the NDS heard that the TNA User Participation Board, in recognition of the efforts, progress made and the commitment of the team over the last year in some challenging circumstances, has agreed to grant the NBP a final extension of one year to complete the project.
Our letter was supported by:
Chris Donnithorne, Naval Biographical Database, http://www.navylist.org/ :
The value of the Navy Board Project is in identifying previously unknown material, and the care with which the process has been undertaken – it is reliable. This does not, of course, insure against error in the original source (thankfully relatively rare) but it does help significantly when faced with a plethora of websites which look terrific but tend to fail miserably when tested against the primary sources.
and Chatham Historic Dockyard Trust Researchers,https://sites.google.com/site/chdtresearchers/
The research group for Chatham Historic Dockyard Trust has made extensive use of the thorough indexing of ADM 106 Navy Board Correspondence. It has enabled us to understand the systems and practices used by the Royal Navy and Royal Dockyards in a fuller and richer way. It helps us produce much richer biographies for individuals we have been researching. Importantly, it helps us cover a wider social/economic range more fully, expanding beyond commissioned officers to provide lots of material on warrant officers and senior dockyard artisans, as well as illuminating material on a significant proportion of lower ranks and tradesmen.
We thank TNA User Participation Board for their consideration, the Principal Record Specialist Manager at The National Archives for military, maritime and transport records and all the volunteers who have contributed their time to the NBP since 1999. But above all we thank Sue Lumas, its driving force and coordinator. The NDS will collaborate in an event to mark the completed project, to celebrate its valuable work in enabling global dissemination, research and publication of this key data for administrative, maritime and cultural history.
To illustrate the importance of this project and the documents thus produced, an example is shown below which is a Discovery entry for ADM 106/330/496, 1678 Dec 5:
Commissioner Sir Richard Beach, Chatham. Is sending a rough draft of the River, with an explanation of the numbers indicated on the plan and the defences proposed. St Mary’s Creek, the the platform at Gillingham, Upnor Castle, Cockram Wood and the yard are marked on the plan. A sentinel is also required at Faversham and a platform should be built on the site of Queenborough Castle and a 4th rate moored at Queenborough creek. Warning should be sent from Faversham and fire ships should be ready at Sheerness. He apologises for the quality of the plan but his sight is failing.
This entry leads to a very significant document in the aftermath of the Dutch Raid on Chatham 9–23 June 1667. This action, which began when Admiral de Ruyter and his fleet arrived in the Thames estuary on 9 June, ended the Second Anglo-Dutch War (1665–67).
To save money in 1667, Charles II had ordered the fleet to be laid up in the Medway anchorage, ostensibly protected by a new Sheerness fort, river batteries and a boom. However, Commissioner Peter Pett failed to carry out his orders. The great ships had not been moved upriver and Sheerness Fort was incomplete. The fort was seized on 10–11 June with an amphibious force of ships and marines, threatening Chatham Dockyard. The Dutch breached the chain and burnt Mary, Royall Oake and Loyall London. At the last minute, ships sunk near the Medway riverbank in Dockyard Reach and the presence of large guns, cavalry and infantry deterred the Dutch advance beyond Upnor Castle. Chatham Dockyard was spared. Nevertheless, the capture of Royal Charles and loss of nine other warships, plus earlier battle losses, represented a shocking humiliation for the king and the country. The Raid effectively ended the war by forcing Charles II to sign the Treaty of Breda. The Dutch only left the Thames Estuary when the English signed the Treaty on 21 July (31 July in the Netherlands).
Ten years later, when the navy was reviewing its strategy, Chatham Commissioner Sir Richard Beach sent his plans to strengthen Medway defences against future attack, accompanied by a key (see below the map)
A rough draft of part of this river with my opinion how it should be fortified against the Attaques or attempts by a fforreigne Enemy
- Chatham Yard
- St Mary Creek
- The platform at Gillingham
- The platform at the lower end of Cookram Wood
- Cookram Wood
- The Birds Nest in which are 18 Guns
- The platform next the Castle wherein are 12 Guns
- The wharf wherein are 3 Crabs for heaving taut the Boome or Chaine
- Upnor Castle
- One of His Majesty’s Ships
- Another Ship
- )Two ships moared with their broadsides towards the Chain
- ) to rake any ships that shall come up the Reach fore & aft
- The Boom or Chain
- Two cables which I would have seased together
- and a chain at each end, as at 18 and 19
- Pieces of Mast or Great Balks to be seased to the upper part of the cable with small chains
Dr Ann Coats
14 April 2018
Remedial action for Portsmouth Dockyard Buildings at Risk
After noting for too long that there had been no progress in conserving many buildings at risk in Portsmouth Dockyard, the NDS Committee decided to send a letter the Ministry of Defence to begin a dialogue about conserving and re-using its most vulnerable buildings.
Evidence shows that the MoD is falling short of government legislation and guidance to maintain its historic dockyard buildings to a ‘good’ standard.
The committee hopes that a cultural collaboration of stakeholders can help set up a MoD Conservation Group or a Heritage Partnership Agreement to resolve reported inconsistencies, deliver sustainable solutions creatively and accomplish what has not been achieved by the MoD in Portsmouth Dockyard in the last ten years.
We look forward to receiving your comments and suggestions.
Dr Ann Coats, FRHistS, Hon. Chair, Naval Dockyards Society
20 February 2017